News

Removal of Women and African-Americans in Jury Selection in South Carolina Capital Cases, 1997-2012 by Ann M. Eisenberg.

ABSTRACT:

The Supreme Court’s May 2016 decision in Foster v. Chatman involved smoking-gun evidence that the State of Georgia discriminated against African-Americans in jury selection during Foster’s 1987 capital trial. Foster was decided on the thirtieth anniversary of Batson v. Kentucky, the first in the line of cases to prohibit striking prospective jurors on the basis of their race or gender. But the evidence of discrimination for Batson challenges is rarely so obvious and available as it was in Foster.

Where litigants have struggled to produce evidence of discrimination in individual cases, empirical studies have been able to assess jury selection practices through a broader lens. This Article uses original data gathered from trial transcripts to examine race- and gender-related exclusion of potential jurors during several stages of jury selection in a set of 35 South Carolina cases that resulted in death sentences from 1997 to 2012. It includes observations for over 3,000 venire members for gender and observations for over 1,000 venire members for race. This is one of few studies to examine the use of peremptory strikes in actual trials; no previous studies of this magnitude have examined this topic in South Carolina.

Consistent with comparable studies, this study’s results revealed that white and black potential jurors had substantially different experiences on their path to the jury box, while gender played a subtler role. Findings included that prosecutors used peremptory strikes against 35% of eligible African-American venire members, compared to 12% of eligible white venire members, and that the death-qualification process impeded a substantial number of African-Americans from serving. These disparities contributed to overrepresentation of whites on the juries. The study’s findings implicate the fairness of some of South Carolina’s current death row inmates, as well as further buttressing the argument that capital conviction and sentencing procedures are incompatible with the need for representative and impartial juries.

September 15, 2016

Removal of Women and African-Americans in Jury Selection in South Carolina Capital Cases, 1997-2012

Removal of Women and African-Americans in Jury Selection in South Carolina Capital Cases, 1997-2012 by Ann M. Eisenberg. ABSTRACT: The Supreme Court’s May 2016 decision in […]
September 14, 2016

NEW VOICES: Former Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro Says Death Penalty Unfixable, “Not Worth It Any More”

In a recent commentary in the Columbus Dispatch, former Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro (pictured) criticized the state’s death penalty as “a broken system that currently serves only the interest of […]
September 12, 2016
This Sept. 21, 2010, photo shows the death chamber of the new lethal injection facility at San Quentin State Prison in San Quentin, Calif.

Muckraker Wants Executions Stopped Until He Can Watch

Sept. 2 MISSOURI: Muckraker Wants Executions Stopped Until He Can Watch A reporter who exposed questionable execution procedures in Missouri, including cash payments to pharmacists and […]
September 12, 2016

Missouri’s Execution Drug Supplier Pleads To Stay Anonymous

[To read full article, click here.] Absent further court action, Missouri will have to reveal the identity of its supplier in the coming weeks. The supplier […]